Ted Cruz kicked all sorts of a$$ in his ‘big bank bailout’ response.
John Kasich is a good democrat. He would a good Hillary bi7ch….(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
November 10, 2015 marked another significant moment in the Republican Presidential race as Senator Ted Cruz engaged in a fiery debate on the topic of bank bailouts. The debate took place on the Fox Business Network (FBN) and showcased Cruz’s strong stance against such measures.
Cruz, a Republican candidate from Texas, has consistently portrayed himself as a champion of free-market principles and limited government intervention. During the debate, he passionately argued against the idea of bank bailouts, criticizing the government’s role in rescuing financial institutions during the 2008 financial crisis.
In his opening statement, Cruz highlighted the negative consequences of these bailouts, pointing out their effect on the economy and the American people. He stated that “Bank bailouts are a mistake, they are a crony capitalist giveaway.”
Cruz firmly believes that such bailouts perpetuate the cycle of risky behavior by banks, as they create a moral hazard by assuring these institutions that they will be rescued regardless of their actions. He argued that this encourages banks to take unnecessary risks, knowing that they will not have to bear the full consequences of their actions.
Furthermore, Cruz argues that bank bailouts undermine the free market. He believes that it is not the government’s role to pick winners and losers in the economy and that bailing out failing banks is a form of crony capitalism. He contends that a genuine free-market system requires allowing poorly managed banks to fail, allowing stronger institutions to rise in their place.
The FBN debate provided Cruz with a platform to showcase his understanding of economic principles and his commitment to limited government intervention. While some other candidates may support the idea of bailouts to stabilize the economy during crises, Cruz remains unwavering in his stance against such measures.
Throughout the debate, Cruz emphasized the importance of empowering individual Americans and reducing the influence of big government and Wall Street. His goal is to create an environment where private sector innovation and entrepreneurship can thrive without the impeding interference of the government.
Cruz’s stance on bank bailouts resonates with many Americans who see government intervention as an infringement on personal and economic freedoms. His position aligns with the principles of the Republican party, which traditionally promotes limited government and free markets.
The FBN debate was yet another opportunity for Ted Cruz to highlight his strong conservative values and his dedication to economic liberty. His unwavering stance against bank bailouts sent a clear message to voters about his commitment to limited government intervention and his belief in the power of the free market. Whether this resonates with the American people and gains him support in the race for the Republican nomination remains to be seen, but it is evident that Cruz will continue to champion these principles on the campaign trail.
Strange that a former Corporate Attorney and husband of a executive at Goldmann Sachs would be consider himself an authority on cracking down against corporate crooks.
Ted Cruz walked the walk. He is a dedicated Christian. A champion debater.
And he is "off the charts brilliant" according to liberal Harvard professor Dershowitz.