Are we in the midst of a new banking crisis?

The collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank in early March threatened to destabilise major banks in Switzerland and Germany, triggering fears of a wider downturn like the one that led to the Great Recession of 2007-2009.

While at this point the crisis seems to have been somewhat contained, is this a sign of a broader structural problem? And what lessons, if any, have been learned since the Great Recession?

In an UpFront Special, host Marc Lamont Hill speaks to world-renowned economist and former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis about what can be done differently this time and why workers always seem to bear the brunt during times of economic downturn.

Subscribe to our channel
Follow us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook
Check our website:
Check out our Instagram page:

@AljazeeraEnglish
#Aljazeeraenglish
#News…(read more)

LEARN ABOUT: Investing During Inflation

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Yanis Varoufakis, the former Finance Minister of Greece, has consistently argued in favor of allowing banks to fail. He believes that this is a necessary step towards reforming the global financial system and preventing another financial crisis.

Varoufakis argues that, in the current system, banks are too big to fail, which incentivizes them to take excessive risks with depositors’ money. When a bank becomes too big, or too interconnected, it becomes a systemic risk to the entire economy. This forces governments to bail out the bank in order to prevent a wider economic collapse. However, by doing so, governments are using taxpayers’ money to reward the very institutions that caused the crisis in the first place.

Instead, Varoufakis believes that we should “let the banks burn.” This means that we should allow large banks to fail when they engage in risky behavior. This would force banks to be more careful with their investments, knowing that the consequences of failure would be severe. It would also send a clear message that banks cannot rely on the government to bail them out when things go wrong.

This approach would also lead to more competition in the banking sector. If large banks knew that they could no longer rely on government bailouts, smaller banks would have a chance to compete on a more level playing field. This would encourage innovation and discourage risky behavior.

Of course, allowing banks to fail would have negative consequences for depositors and other stakeholders. However, Varoufakis argues that it is ultimately a necessary step towards creating a more stable financial system. Instead of using taxpayer money to bail out failed banks, he suggests that this money should be used to compensate those affected by the bank’s failure.

While it may seem radical to let banks fail, Varoufakis’s arguments are grounded in a rigorous understanding of the flaws in the current financial system. He recognizes that the current system creates perverse incentives for banks, and that allowing them to fail is the best way to prevent another financial crisis.

In conclusion, Yanis Varoufakis’s proposal to “let the banks burn” is not without its risks. However, it is a necessary step towards reforming the global financial system and creating more stable and competitive banks. Instead of rewarding banks for risky behavior, we should send a clear message that they are accountable for their own actions.