Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) rejects further bailouts of banking institutions and the creation of taxpayer liability for undisclosed amounts of money with no accountability….(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Bernie Sanders on Bank Bailouts during the S & L Crisis

October 31, 1991

In the early 1990s, a financial crisis known as the Savings and Loan (S & L) crisis wreaked havoc on the American economy. The crisis was marked by the collapse of numerous savings and loan associations, which were financial institutions primarily responsible for providing mortgages to American citizens. As the extent of the crisis became apparent, the question of whether to bail out these failing banks or let them face the consequences of their reckless actions arose.

Amidst this economic turmoil, Bernie Sanders, a steadfast advocate for the working class, took a firm stance against bailing out the insolvent S & L institutions. As a congressman from Vermont, Sanders resisted any government intervention that would reward the banks for their mismanagement and irresponsible behavior. He strongly believed that the burden of such a crisis should not be placed on the American taxpayers but rather on the shoulders of those responsible for the financial mess.

Sanders argued that the S & L crisis was a result of the deregulation policies championed by the Reagan administration in the 1980s. These policies allowed savings and loan associations to operate with minimal oversight and engage in risky practices, leading to their eventual collapse. He fiercely criticized the lax regulations that permitted these institutions to pursue speculative investments and shady lending practices, which ultimately led to their insolvency.

Instead of using taxpayer money to bail out these banks, Sanders proposed that the government should use its resources to assist the affected depositors. He advocated for strengthening deposit insurance and ensuring that people who entrusted their money to these institutions would not suffer due to the banks’ failures.

Sanders contended that corporate executives and major shareholders should be held accountable for the crisis. He argued for stricter regulations to prevent future financial crises, the prosecution of those responsible, and the recovery of funds squandered by the banks. He believed that if the government had to intervene, it should do so in a way that prioritizes the interests of the people and not the wealthy elite.

While Sanders’ stance was met with both support and opposition, his principled stance against corporate welfare and his unwavering commitment to the working class resonated with many Americans. His critics contended that his strong opposition to bailouts might exacerbate the financial crisis and undermine the stability of the banking sector. However, Sanders remained resolute in his belief that taxpayers’ money should not be used to prop up failing institutions at the expense of the average citizen.

Today, Sanders’ position on bank bailouts during the S & L crisis represents his enduring commitment to holding corporations accountable for their actions, protecting the interests of the working class, and advocating for a fairer and more just economic system. His stance on corporate accountability and responsible regulation continues to influence his policies and resonate with a significant portion of the American public.

As the echoes of the S & L crisis fade into history, Bernie Sanders’ resolute determination to prevent future financial crises and prioritize the needs of ordinary citizens serves as a reminder of the importance of holding corporate institutions to the highest standards of accountability.