Comparing Bank Failures: Past and Present Perspectives | Written by Douglas E. French

by | Aug 19, 2023 | Bank Failures | 5 comments

Comparing Bank Failures: Past and Present Perspectives | Written by Douglas E. French




Presented by Douglas E. French at “Depression, Monetary Destruction, and the Path to Sound Money”: the Mises Circle in Greenville, South Carolina, 3 October 2009. Sponsored by Atlantic Bullion and Coin, and Professional Planning of Easley, LLC….(read more)


LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing


Bank Failures: Then and Now

By Douglas E. French

As the saying goes, history often repeats itself. This couldn’t be truer when it comes to the topic of bank failures. Over the years, we have seen numerous instances of banks collapsing, leading to widespread panic and economic turmoil. While some may argue that we have learned from past mistakes and the banking industry is now more stable, it’s important to delve into the details and understand how the situation has evolved over time.

Looking back at the era of the Great Depression in the 1930s, bank failures were all too common. The underlying causes were numerous, from reckless lending practices to a lack of regulatory oversight. This perfect storm eventually led to a wave of bank collapses, wiping out the hard-earned savings of millions of individuals and precipitating a severe economic downturn.

One of the primary reasons for the failures then was the widespread practice of banks making risky loans and investments without appropriate safeguards. Speculation and unwise gambling by bank executives led to the accumulation of bad debts, with a lack of liquidity exacerbating the problem. When depositors panicked and rushed to withdraw their funds, the banks simply could not meet the demand, resulting in many closures.

See also  As Bank Bailouts Begin, Silver Premiums Skyrocket

Fast forward to the present day, and we find ourselves in a different regulatory environment. After the financial crisis of 2008, governments around the world established a string of reforms to prevent a repeat of the past. Increased capital requirements, stricter lending standards, and enhanced regulatory supervision were all implemented to improve the stability of the banking system.

As a result, we have seen significantly fewer bank failures in recent times. The lessons learned from the past have led to a more cautious approach when it comes to risk-taking, and banks are now subject to tighter scrutiny and stricter regulations. This has undoubtedly provided a sense of security to depositors and investors, who can have more confidence in the stability of the banking sector.

However, it would be premature to assume that the risk of bank failures has been eradicated completely. While regulatory measures have certainly reduced the likelihood of systemic collapses, the underlying issues that led to past failures still exist to some extent. Banks are still exposed to risks associated with lending practices, and the global interconnectedness of financial institutions means that any shock to the system can have far-reaching consequences.

Moreover, the advent of new technologies and the rise of non-traditional financial institutions bring additional challenges to the stability of the banking sector. Fintech startups and digital platforms have disrupted traditional banking models, raising questions about the resilience of the system in the face of rapid change. As these new players continue to emerge, it is essential for regulators to adapt and ensure their oversight is comprehensive and effective.

See also  Canadian Mortgage Rates and US Bank Failures: Impact on Real Estate Market and Realtors

In conclusion, bank failures have been a recurring theme throughout history. While efforts have been made to prevent a recurrence of the disastrous events of the past, the risk of failures still exists. Stricter regulations and increased supervision have undoubtedly improved the stability of the banking industry, but vigilance is necessary. The lessons learned from past failures must guide our future approach, and continuous adaptation to evolving technologies and market dynamics is crucial for maintaining a resilient banking sector.

Truth about Gold
You May Also Like

5 Comments

  1. UNKNOWN

    ditto.

  2. Evan's Easy Japanese

    yeah, for me, my venture so far into Austrian economics has been:

    Ron Paul's Money Bomb (on my birthday! Dec 16th!)
    Watching as much Ron Paul vid's as possible.
    Thomas woods vids, followed by Meltdown.
    Ron Paul Books
    Economics in One Lesson – best. book. ever.
    Every video on the MisesMedia channel
    rothbard's books (and that's where i am now)

  3. ErwinSchrodinger64

    Dear God,

    I truly mean this as a prayer(or to any greater power). Why the hell do we continue to follow this Keynesian moral of economics.

    To me the Austrian view isn't a theoretical view of economics. It's only the least falsified theory when it comes to economics. Like Henry Hazlitt stated so elegantly, "to truly understand any economic policy-you have to understand it full circle. Not just on who benefits but who doesn't".

    I'm not an economist but I even understand this view.

  4. Heatonlou

    Three went bust Fri 12/11

  5. constablekohler

    More videos!! This is great. They are very much appreciated. Thank you Mises Institute.

U.S. National Debt

The current U.S. national debt:
$35,866,603,223,541

Source

ben stein recessions & depressions

Retirement Age Calculator

  Original Size