Via Boom Bust RT America: The crash of 2008 turned the whole US and global economy upside down. Mollye Barrows joins Bart Chilton to discuss.

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!:

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire’s video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel:

Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Google+:
Instagram:

Follow more of our stories at

Subscribe to our podcast: …(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

A Look Back At The Economic Impact Of Bank Bailouts

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, governments around the world turned to one controversial solution – bank bailouts. These massive interventions were aimed at stabilizing the financial system and preventing a collapse that would have disastrous consequences for the global economy. While the bailouts successfully averted an immediate catastrophe, their long-term impact has continued to be a subject of debate.

The economic impact of bank bailouts was multi-faceted. On one hand, the injection of government funds into troubled financial institutions helped restore market confidence and prevented a widespread banking panic. The bailouts also provided a safety net for depositors and borrowers, ensuring that they would not lose their savings or be left stranded without access to credit. In that sense, they played a crucial role in averting a deeper and more prolonged recession.

However, the bank bailouts came at a considerable cost. Governments poured billions, even trillions, of dollars into salvaging failing banks, leading to an increase in public debt levels. This was a significant concern for fiscal conservatives who feared long-term consequences, such as a potential downgrade of sovereign credit ratings or an unsustainable debt burden for future generations.

Moreover, the bailouts sparked public outrage as taxpayers felt the unfairness of paying for the reckless behavior of banks that had contributed to the crisis. Critics argued that the bailouts were essentially a moral hazard, as they encouraged banks to take excessive risks with the knowledge that they would be bailed out if things went wrong. This perception of preferential treatment for the financial sector deepened the public’s distrust of banks and the regulatory system, contributing to a growing sense of income inequality and social injustice.

Another controversial aspect of the bank bailouts was the lack of accountability. While some executives faced consequences, many maintained their positions and even received substantial bonuses despite their failures. This lack of repercussions for those responsible for the crisis further fueled public anger and raised questions about the effectiveness of regulatory oversight.

It is also important to note that bank bailouts did not solve the underlying issues within the financial system. Critics argue that the bailouts merely delayed the need for crucial reforms, such as increased regulation and stricter oversight, necessary to prevent similar crises from occurring in the future. Without fundamental changes, the potential for another financial collapse remains a concern.

Overall, a decade after the financial crisis, the economic impact of bank bailouts is a complex issue with both positive and negative consequences. While the bailouts prevented an immediate catastrophe and stabilized the financial system, they also had significant costs and long-term implications. Nevertheless, the experience of the 2008 crisis has highlighted the need for ongoing scrutiny and reform in the financial sector to ensure that banks act responsibly and do not put the entire economy at risk.