The Fed just bailed out the banks including SVB and Signature, but what does it all mean?
The Truth About The Silicon Valley Bank Failure –
⭐️ Join the Homebuyer Masterclass ⭐️
⭐️Get “Secrets To Getting A Low Mortgage Interest Rate” at ⭐️
👍 Subscribe by clicking here
💰👉💪 Join The Down Payment Challenge
⭐️Get your free copy of The Mortgaged Millionaire at
To apply for a mortgage go to
To download our mobile mortgage app go to
Want to join our A-Team?
Want us to hand select a realtor for you
The presenter has taken great care in preparing
this video, however makes no representations or warranties with
respect to the accuracy or completeness of its content. The contents
of this video should not be considered a substitute for
professional financial advice. Please consult a financial professional
before implementing any of the strategies described in
this video. The presenter shall not be held liable
for any loss of profit or any other financial damages, including
but not limited to special, consequential, incidental, or other
damages….(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
The federal bank bailout, commonly known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), was a government program initiated during the 2008 financial crisis. The program was intended to prevent the collapse of the financial system by providing financial assistance to struggling banks and other financial institutions.
The TARP bailout was initiated after a series of financial institutions in the United States faced bankruptcy and a point of no return. The bailout was proposed by then-President George W. Bush and passed by Congress in October of 2008. The program authorized $700 billion in funding, which was to be used to stabilize the financial system and prevent a total economic collapse.
The TARP bailout was a controversial initiative at the time, with many people questioning whether or not it was the best course of action. Some believed that the bailout was a necessary measure to prevent a complete collapse of the financial system, while others believed that it would set a dangerous precedent and reward irresponsible behavior on the part of banks and financial institutions.
So, what exactly did the TARP bailout entail? The program was designed to provide financial assistance to banks and other financial institutions in a number of ways. One of the primary aspects of the program was the purchase of toxic assets from banks. These toxic assets, such as mortgage-backed securities, were at the center of the financial crisis and had caused many banks to face bankruptcy. By purchasing these toxic assets from banks, the government helped to stabilize their balance sheets and keep them afloat.
Another aspect of the TARP bailout was the provision of loans to banks that were struggling. The idea was that these loans would help banks to weather the storm and continue to provide loans and other financial services to businesses and individuals. The program also included the provision of capital injections to banks, which helped to bolster their finances and keep them solvent.
So, how did the TARP bailout ultimately turn out? There is no clear cut answer to this question. On one hand, the program did help to stabilize the financial system and prevent a complete economic collapse. Many banks and financial institutions were able to recover and continue to operate today. On the other hand, many people criticize the program for rewarding irresponsible behavior on the part of banks and financial institutions, and for favoring large corporations over ordinary people.
Overall, the TARP bailout was a complex and controversial program that was designed to address some of the most pressing financial issues facing the United States at the time. While it is difficult to say with certainty whether or not the program was a success, it is clear that it played an important role in preventing a total economic collapse and stabilizing the financial system.
It’s a bailout.
How does fractional banking fit into this?
Great vid do you edit them yourself?
What were the reasons companies took money out in the first place? This seems like a prisoners' dilemma from all the explanations I've heard. If depositors left their money in the system, no one would of been financially hurt. I feel there is more to this story.
Very good explanation. Thank you. Subscribed.
When the bonds reach maturity the huge losses will be realized, because inflation is a lot higher than interest rates. The amount that people are willing to pay for those bonds today is the true value of those bonds.
I certainly disagree with the fact that valuing a seemingly low risk asset like UST at face value vs market value is risk free. Therefore, this is very much a bailout. Transferring liquidity from the Treasury to SVB certainly seems like a low risk move until UST CDS pop then everyone will come looking for the same liquidity. Even the US government won't be able to stop that type of liquidity drain then.
Anyhow, calling something that has low risk "no risk" goes against all sorts of financial logics. This is just another move to pull wool over the public's eyes so that they don't have to face up to the fact that there needs to be losers in this game, losers that they didn't pick.
bet ya didnt hear they had a buyer.. but FDIC steped in and stopped it.. Bidens whitelist.. can you say DBDC.. control the $$$ control the population …
@ Nolan. they collapsed the biggest crypto bank.. (silvergate) (Signature) .. they are going after crypto.. hehehehehehehe watch
Time equals money, so it is a bailout … giving the bonds free time to mature in essence is providing the banks the difference till maturity without interest. Whoever thinks this is not a bailout needs to learn the concept of time value for money… a buck today is worth more than a buck tomorrow ( specially with where inflation is).
ponzi scheme… scam after scam… im a full blown retard with brain damage.. i seen it coming.. and showed you the proof month ago,,, now to watch your explanation 🙂
they could have bailed out the employees for the companies who lost payroll. the logical reason for the bailout is irrational.
Excellent, just a little bookkeeping regulationihas changed. The FED has more bonds sold than ever, by the depositors running to safety, so they can LEND, and don't forget, the FED can print 10 times for each dollar received in their USA BONDS SALES. And yes, it increases the 32 trillion dollar debt. BAILOUT!
Yes it’s a bailout. We need to stop socializing investment loses.
What fed did to the bank is just what every variable rate mortgage borrower of 21-22 wants to have right now. But as always common man doesn’t get these benefits(alias bailout).
It’s a bailout, offcourse!
Waiting for that sweet sweet pivot this summer. Business should be booming for Nolan. No more Popeyes for date night!!!
Make a video on how rates are affected by the SV bank crash, please!
The Fed is basically admitting that their treasury yields rates are meaningless and they will print to the moon to cover. This is an admonition that they don't have/need any controls over the money printer, and they will never turn it off. Countries on the other side of the USD don't take kindly when they are playing a game of Monopoly against the banker who has infinite paper, and they have to pass "GO" each time.
SVB was hand-picked to fail. CEO and other inner-circle execs sold off stock weeks prior (this is documented). Regulators knew the precarious positions and over-leverage of these banks. This wasn't an "Accident" brought on by a bank run/selloff of bank held treasuries.
Look at who profited after these latest event? JP Morgan, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, etc.. All got huge inflows. They all get to pick up the risk-free assets and let the other toxic assets go down with SVB. Same model as Lehman Bros. all over again.
SVB was just big enough to trigger panic in the financial system. All the small banks will go down in the next 6 months and guess who will get bigger and bigger? All the TBTF banks which the govt will "Federalize" through bailouts and emergency action to finally bring in the CBDC. US consumers will have no choice.
This is all planned to monopolize (collapse the US economy), then federalize (introduce CBDCs) and then hand it all over to a conglomerate of central bankers that was to eliminate any threat to absolute control.
Fed: People need to lose their job to reduce inflation and stabilize the economy
SVB goes bankrupt
Fed: Not this group of people
Good summary Nolan!
In 2009, the Fed used the TARP program to buy toxic assets from the banks as a bail-out. Bankers took bonuses with the bail-out money. Today, they will redeem de-valued bonds at par and SVB avoids a real loss. Not sure of the difference, except executives took bonuses before sounding the alarm this time.
This is a 'Moral Hazard', as banks are being told there is no consequence for their actions. At best, the banking system will be nationalized with politicians running it. At worst, banks will become more reckless with their risk taking. We have kicked the can down the road and in 5-years may face an even bigger problem. They seem to be coming faster and be more severe. Bring on CBDC!
The housing bulls will need to put the champagne away. Every realtor youtuber has been celebrating an inevitable return to 2021 because they believe central banks will need to cut the interest rate to zero again.
The new bond buying program with the fed backing financial institutions gives them more fire power to kill inflation problem knowing the banking sector has the government backing
Hi Nolan, your instinct on Fed raising the rate?
Yes/No
Thanks for the great video again