Follow Dan’s guide to stock buys & sells:
Listen to Dan Live every day at
Like Dan on Facebook:
Follow Dan on Twitter:

Watch & Listen to the Truth: Dan’s Commentary
Dan Celia On Fox Business’ Cavuto Coast to Coast:
China Will Be First Domino To Fall in World Economic Collapse:
2016 Republican President will improve US Markets:
Let’s be real the Economy is Bad:

Financial Issues – Program October 17, 2016

*Information given by Dan could be based upon time sensitive market data or economic situations that are subject to change….(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Bank Bailouts Imminent: Glass-Steagall is a Problem

The global financial system is no stranger to bailouts. Throughout history, governments have stepped in to rescue failing banks, reassuring the public and preventing economic collapse. However, the recurrence of such bailouts raises questions about the underlying problems within the banking sector. One essential issue that is quickly gaining attention is the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which has facilitated risky behavior and contributed to the need for government intervention.

The Glass-Steagall Act, also known as the Banking Act of 1933, was implemented in the wake of the Great Depression with the aim of separating commercial banking activities from investment banking. The act’s objective was to prevent banks from engaging in high-risk speculative activities, protecting depositors and preserving stability in the financial system.

However, in 1999, the financial landscape shifted dramatically when the U.S. Congress repealed a key provision of the Glass-Steagall Act. The repeal allowed for the merging of commercial and investment banks, creating what is known as universal banks. This decision, while initially celebrated as a step towards modernization, has since proven to be a significant problem.

The repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed banks to engage in a wide range of activities, including securities underwriting, proprietary trading, and investing in hedge funds. As a result, these universal banks were no longer limited to traditional banking practices but were exposed to increased risks and interconnectedness with capital markets.

The 2008 financial crisis exposed the dangers of this new banking model. Large investment banks, which had expanded their activities after the repeal of Glass-Steagall, faced significant losses due to their exposure to toxic mortgage-backed securities. With their collapse imminent, governments worldwide were forced to intervene with massive bailouts to prevent a complete meltdown of the financial system.

Proponents of Glass-Steagall argue that its reinstatement is crucial in order to prevent future financial crises and limit the need for taxpayer-funded bailouts. They argue that the separation of commercial and investment banking activities would reduce systemic risks and ring-fence traditional banking activities from the speculative behaviors of investment banks.

Detractors, on the other hand, suggest that Glass-Steagall is an outdated regulation and would hinder the competitiveness of financial institutions in the global market. They argue that it is more effective to strengthen regulations and oversight over the banking industry instead of reverting to the strict separation of activities.

However, the recent economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have reignited the debate surrounding the Glass-Steagall Act. Governments around the world have once again stepped in with massive fiscal stimulus packages, and many banks are now facing significant losses and potential failures. As the consequences of this crisis continue to unfold, the fragile stability of the financial system is once again under scrutiny.

While it is undeniable that the banking sector plays a critical role in the economy, it is equally crucial to ensure that banks operate responsibly and do not pose a systemic risk. The urgent need for bank bailouts and the inherent instability in the financial system indicate that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was indeed a problem.

Moving forward, governments, regulators, and the banking industry should seriously consider reevaluating the merits of the Glass-Steagall Act. Striking a balance between competitiveness and stability is paramount to safeguard the economy. It is imperative to find new solutions that prioritize the well-being of depositors, protect taxpayers, and prevent future bailouts from becoming an endless cycle.