The three main U.S. bank regulators this Tuesday faced lawmakers demanding to know how three banks collapsed within days of each other.
The bankruptcy of Silvergate, Silicon Valley and Signature banks led to fears of a new global financial crisis – especially after Swiss bank Credit Suisse had to be bailed out. The circumstances for each were slightly different, but there are similar questions about the management for these banks.
The question is why the U.S. eased stringent regulations imposed by Congress on banks after the 2008 crash. Owen Fairclough reports.

Watch CGTN LIVE on your computer, tablet or mobile

Subscribe to CGTN America on YouTube
Follow CGTN America:
Twitter: @cgtnamerica
Facebook: @cgtnamerica
Instagram: @cgtnamerica
TikTok: @newstoks

This material is distributed by MediaLinks TV, LLC on behalf of CCTV. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C….(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Senate Holds Hearings on Recent Bank Failures

The United States Senate has recently conducted hearings to investigate the recent spate of bank failures that have left many Americans concerned about the stability of the financial system. The hearings, held by the Senate Banking Committee, aimed to shed light on the causes of these failures and explore potential solutions to prevent such crises in the future.

The hearing sessions provided an opportunity for senators to question top banking executives, regulators, and experts in the field. It was an important step in understanding the root causes of these failures and determining the regulatory and legislative actions required to prevent similar occurrences moving forward.

One of the key issues highlighted during the hearings was the role of risk management in preventing bank failures. Many senators expressed concerns over the lack of effective risk assessment and oversight within financial institutions. They emphasized the importance of stricter regulations to ensure banks are adequately prepared for potential setbacks and are capable of absorbing losses without requiring government bailouts.

Moreover, the hearings sought to address the issue of banks that are “too big to fail.” This term refers to financial institutions that are so large and interconnected that their failure would have catastrophic effects on the overall economy. Senators explored potential measures to address this issue, such as imposing stricter capital requirements and implementing mechanisms to facilitate an orderly resolution process in the event of a failure.

Another area of focus during the hearings was the need for transparency and accountability in the banking sector. Several senators raised concerns about the lack of transparency surrounding banks’ financial practices and risk exposure. They emphasized the importance of comprehensive and timely reporting to regulators and shareholders in order to identify any potential vulnerabilities before they escalate into systemic problems.

Apart from investigating the causes of recent bank failures, the hearings also aimed to determine how best to protect consumers from the negative consequences of these failures. Senators highlighted the need for improved consumer protection regulations to prevent predatory lending practices and ensure fair treatment for customers. They stressed the importance of holding banks accountable for any misconduct and ensuring appropriate compensation for affected individuals.

Overall, the Senate hearings on recent bank failures provided a crucial platform for lawmakers to thoroughly examine the issues at hand. By questioning key stakeholders and experts, senators were able to gain valuable insights into the causes of these failures and the regulatory changes needed to prevent their recurrence. The hearings played a pivotal role in paving the way for legislative and regulatory reforms aimed at strengthening the financial system and safeguarding the interests of consumers.