NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has passed a motion calling for David Johnston to leave his role probing foreign interference allegations, but Johnston says he’s not done as special rapporteur. Plus, what does the boost in RCMP protection for senior government ministers and public servants say about our political climate?

At Issue is Canada’s most-watched political panel, hosted by CBC Chief Political Correspondent Rosemary Barton and featuring leading political journalists; Chantal Hebert, Andrew Coyne and Althia Raj.

00:00 At Issue: NDP motion to remove David Johnston
10:30 At Issue: Extra RCMP protection for top politicians

#Poltics #Canada #CBCNews

Watch The National live on YouTube Sunday-Friday at 9 p.m. ET

Subscribe to The National:

Connect with The National online:
Facebook |
Twitter |
Instagram |

More from CBC News |

The National is the flagship of CBC News, showcasing award-winning journalism from across Canada and around the world. Led by Chief Correspondent Adrienne Arsenault and Ian Hanomansing, our team of trusted reporters help you make sense of the world, wherever you are. The National was named Canada’s Best National Newscast by the Canadian Screen Awards and RTDNA Canada….(read more)

HOW TO: Hedge Against Inflation

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Title: Should David Johnston Step Down as Special Rapporteur?

Introduction:

David Johnston, the current Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression, has come under scrutiny recently due to allegations of biased reporting and a potential conflict of interest. As the appointed overseer of human rights-related issues, it is essential to evaluate whether Johnston’s tenure should continue or if he should step down from his role. This article delves into the reasons behind the controversy and examines whether a change in leadership may be needed.

1. Allegations of Biased Reporting:

One of the critical points raised against Johnston is his alleged biased reporting towards certain countries or parties. Some argue that his reports tend to be focused on selective cases, undermining his credibility and impartiality. As a Special Rapporteur, it is crucial to maintain a neutral standpoint and ensure all voices are heard, irrespective of geopolitical considerations.

2. Questionable Objectivity due to Previous Experience:

David Johnston’s prior roles and affiliations have given rise to concerns regarding his impartiality. Critics argue that his previous employment as a human rights advocate with a particular focus on certain regions may influence his current reports and findings. The Special Rapporteur’s position requires the utmost objectivity and independence, and any doubts about these attributes could undermine the integrity of the entire mandate.

3. Potential Conflict of Interest:

Johnston’s professional connections and prior associations have led some to question whether a conflict of interest may exist in his role as the Special Rapporteur. If there is even a perception that his personal or professional ties could influence the direction of his work, it raises concerns about his ability to perform the duties of this important position effectively.

4. Need for New Perspectives and Fresh Ideas:

Periodic changes in leadership can introduce fresh perspectives, ideas, and solutions to ongoing challenges. While Johnston’s experience and knowledge undoubtedly contribute to his effectiveness, a potential replacement could bring diverse and alternative approaches to address human rights violations more comprehensively.

Conclusion:

The question of whether David Johnston should step down as the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression cannot be taken lightly. The allegations of biased reporting, questionable objectivity due to prior experience, and potential conflict of interest require a thorough examination to ensure the integrity of the role. Ultimately, the decision regarding Johnston’s position should be reached after a comprehensive evaluation to ensure the UN Human Rights Council’s mandate is fulfilled without any doubts. The appointment of a new Special Rapporteur may bring new perspectives, re-establish impartiality, and reinforce the credibility of the position.