Naming a Trust for a Non-Spouse as Beneficiary of an IRA

by | Sep 15, 2022 | Inherited IRA | 11 comments

Naming a Trust for a Non-Spouse as Beneficiary of an IRA




Build your estate plan online! MyAdvocate is the online solution for creating and maintaining your Will and all other legally-valid estate planning documents. Click the link below to get started!


This article address the Required Minimum Distribution (“RMD”) rules when a trust for the benefit of a non-spouse is named as the beneficiary of an Individual retirement account (“IRA”).

To address this topic, we’ll need to first address the RMD rules for a non-spouse beneficiary, and then look at how those rules are impacted by naming a trust for a non-spouse as a beneficiary of an IRA.

Let’s take an example. Let’s say Dad owns a $500,000 IRA. He wants to name his son (“Son”) as the beneficiary, but Dad is worried that Son will blow the money after Dad dies. Nonetheless, Dad dies and Dad’s IRA gets transferred to Son’s Inherited IRA.

Some people mistakenly believe that Son can wait until Son is 70.5 years old before distributions must begin. Others mistakenly believe that Son will be penalized if he takes distributions prior to Son turning 59.5. However, the rule is that Son may take distributions based on Son’s remaining life expectancy. So, if Son is 30 when Dad dies, the IRS tables indicate that Son has a life expectancy to age 83 (53 year remaining life expectancy). Son must take a minimum of 1/53 (about 1.9%) of the IRA starting in the year after Dad dies.

However, Dad’s concern is that, due to Son’s immaturity, or perhaps due to Son’s wife’s influence over Son, Son will take a distribution of the entire amount, and spend it, perhaps without even being able to pay the tax on that significant amount – this would create a tremendous problem for Son.

See also  Endless Devouring Season: Awakening of the Ancient Dragon Soul in Episodes 1-86 - Yang Chen Becomes a Supreme All-Attribute Martial Artist in a Thrilling, Adventure-Filled Fantasy Battle. #Action #Adventure #Fantasy #Combat

So Dad looks into the possibility of naming a “Look-Through” or “See-Through” trust for Son as the beneficiary of Dad’s IRA. The trust would require that, after Dad’s death, the trustee would see to it that Son would receive his RMD, and the trustee could make additional taxable distributions to Son if the trustee determined that Son needed them for his health, education, maintenance, or support.

If Dad properly sets up the trust, Dad knows that Son will be an income until age 83, and that Son’s basic living needs will be met. Dad will also know that Son will not be able to blow the entire IRA, so Dad will protect Son from himself (and perhaps Son’s wife).

There are four requirement of a trust that must be met to get the “Look-Through” or “See-Through” treatment. But when these requirements are met, you can look through the trust and use the life expectancy of the individual trust beneficiary for RMD purposes. An ineligible trust will require taxable distributions at a much faster rate.

Note that for purposes of this article, we did not address the following circumstances: when a surviving spouse is involved, when there are multiple beneficiaries and the concept of separate accounts, and we did not address naming a charity, an estate, or an ineligible trust as a beneficiary of an IRA.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. Using this site or communicating with Rabalais Estate Planning, LLC, through this site does not form an attorney/client relationship.

See also  I Inherited an IRA Now What?

Paul Rabalais
Estate Planning Attorney
www.RabalaisEstatePlanning.com
Phone: (225) 329-2450…(read more)


LEARN MORE ABOUT: IRA Accounts

TRANSFER IRA TO GOLD: Gold IRA Account

TRANSFER IRA TO SILVER: Silver IRA Account

REVEALED: Best Gold Backed IRA


Truth about Gold
You May Also Like

11 Comments

  1. Amy Cuff

    This is antiquated information. The new tax laws have changed.

  2. Tom Mason

    Excellent videos. Plainly spoken amidst such a complex area of law. Thank you.

  3. bleonardyou

    This information is no longer valid after the SECURE ACT. I suggest replacing it with a new one with a current one.

  4. Stephen

    This video has been deemed invalid, upon issue of the SECURE Act. No longer applicable? Should it be taken down? Replaced?

  5. yan shao

    ,,,,,, , , , , ,

  6. Robert Burton

    Really enjoy your videos on Trusts- I have a revocable living trust, funding it now. Should I put my IRA into the Trust? Right now the IRA shows "Estate of" as the beneficiary. I have three children all adults, listed in the Trust to receive 1/3 each of what is left in the Trust after I pass on-your thoughts greatly appreciated.

  7. PA Ocampo

    Mr. Rabalais, could you clarify whether an existing RLT, if ammended with appropriate language, can spring an IRA Inheritance Trust with the required number sub of see-thrugh sub trusts in the names of your targeted IRA beneficiaries? Is this the correct structure?

  8. Slim Dawg

    Secure act probably blows up this look through trust

  9. Priscilla Strickland

    What if there are multiple beneficiaries of a look-thru trust which will distribute out to 3 children?  Is the life expectancy of the oldest child used to calculate the distribution

  10. IThinkNowListenUp

    Can I protect rmd's into non community property account? Is setting up a account for these funds simply a matter of using tax Id of trust account?

  11. Barton and Marina Johnson

    How can I ensure my sister gets my IRA and not my husband? My greatest fear is that he won't notify my sister of my death?

U.S. National Debt

The current U.S. national debt:
$35,866,603,223,541

Source

ben stein recessions & depressions

Retirement Age Calculator

  Original Size