Trains will grind to a halt in France on Thursday, classrooms will be shut and businesses disrupted as workers walk off their jobs in an attempt to derail a planned pension reform that would see the retirement age pushed up by two years to 64. Pushing back the retirement age by two years and extending the pay-in period would yield an additional 17.7 billion euros ($19.1 billion) in annual pension contributions, allowing the system to break even by 2027, according to Labour Ministry estimates. Unions argue there are other ways to ensure the viability of the pension system. FRANCE 24’s Business Editor Charles Pellegrin explains.
#France #pension #retirement

🔔 Subscribe to France 24 now:
🔴 LIVE – Watch FRANCE 24 English 24/7 here:

🌍 Read the latest International News and Top Stories:

Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Twitter:
Discover the news in pictures on Instagram: …(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Retirement Pension Plans

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

The French government has recently unveiled plans for a major reform of the country’s retirement system. One of the key proposals is to get rid of the specialized pension schemes that currently exist, and instead create a single, universal system for all workers. This move has sparked both support and opposition, with many questioning the implications and potential consequences.

Currently, France operates under a system that provides various pension schemes for different professional groups. These specialized schemes were initially implemented to cater to the specific needs and demands of certain professions, such as train drivers, air traffic controllers, lawyers, and nurses. These schemes typically offer more favorable retirement terms compared to the general public system, granting earlier retirement ages and more generous benefits.

However, the government argues that these specialized schemes create inequalities and are financially unsustainable in the long run. They argue that a universal, points-based system would be fairer and would promote solidarity among all workers. Under the proposed reform, every worker would accumulate points over their working life, which would then determine their pension amount upon retirement.

Proponents of the reform argue that it would simplify the retirement system, making it more transparent and equitable for everyone. They argue that the current system, with its numerous schemes and exceptions, is too complex and prone to abuse. It is estimated that around 42 different pension schemes exist in France, leading to confusion and inconsistency.

The government’s plan also aims to address the demographic challenge France is facing. Like many other Western countries, France is experiencing an aging population, which puts pressure on the sustainability of the pension system. By replacing the specialized schemes with a universal system, the government hopes to achieve long-term financial stability and ensure that future generations can also benefit from a decent retirement.

However, the proposed reform has not been without controversy. Critics argue that it would lead to a decrease in pension benefits for many workers, particularly those who currently benefit from the specialized schemes. They fear that a one-size-fits-all approach would not adequately consider the specificities and demands of certain professions, leading to injustice and dissatisfaction.

Trade unions have been particularly vocal in their opposition to the reform plans, with several strikes and protests taking place across the country. They argue that the proposed changes would disproportionately affect some of the most vital sectors of the French economy, such as transport and healthcare. For example, train drivers and air traffic controllers currently enjoy early retirement ages due to the physically and mentally demanding nature of their jobs. Critics fear that the elimination of specialized schemes would force these workers to retire later, risking safety and service quality.

As the debate over retirement reform intensifies, political leaders and stakeholders continue to engage in negotiations and consultations. The government has expressed its willingness to discuss and potentially revise certain elements of the proposed reform, indicating a willingness to find a compromise that can address concerns while ensuring the long-term viability of the pension system.

The retirement reform plans in France are undoubtedly ambitious and face significant challenges. Balancing the need for financial sustainability, fairness, and safeguarding specialized professions’ rights will require careful and nuanced decision-making. The final form of the reform will likely require a delicate balance between these competing interests, ensuring the retirement system can adapt to an aging population while guaranteeing fairness for all workers.