The air traffic control failure was caused by flight data received by National Air Traffic Services (NATS), an initial investigation has found.
Mark Rolfe explained such “complex” technical issues occur “very occasionally” and can take longer to resolve, but NATS’ systems are designed to “isolate the problem” and prioritise safety.
Read more:
#flight #airline #natsu
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos:
Follow us on Twitter:
Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on TikTok:
For more content go to and download our apps: Apple Android
Sky News Daily podcast is available for free here:
Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí:
To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here: …(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
The recent air traffic failure in the United Kingdom left thousands of passengers stranded and caused chaos at airports across the country. For days, flights were grounded, delays were rampant, and confusion reigned as authorities struggled to rectify the situation. As the dust settles, the initial investigations have revealed the reason behind this unprecedented glitch in English air traffic control.
The glitch was attributed to a software failure, causing the Electronic Flight Plan System to crash. The software is a critical component of air traffic control that allows controllers to manage flights, track aircraft positions, and ensure safe separation between aircraft. Without this system functioning properly, controllers were unable to efficiently handle the high volume of air traffic.
While the exact cause of the software failure is still being investigated, sources suggest that a minor update to the system’s code led to an unforeseen compatibility issue. As a result, the software became overwhelmed, eventually crashing under the strain of the increased workload during a particularly busy period.
This occurrence highlights the importance of rigorous testing and quality control in critical systems such as air traffic control. Given the potential implications of a failure in this domain, it is imperative that updates and modifications to the software are thoroughly vetted and compatibility issues are identified before implementation.
Moreover, this incident raises questions about the resilience and redundancy measures in place within the air traffic control system. While emergencies and unforeseen events can occur, it is crucial that a backup plan is readily available to mitigate risks and swiftly recover from a system failure. In this case, proper contingency plans were not activated promptly, exacerbating the disruption and adding to the confusion experienced by passengers.
The repercussions of this glitch extended far beyond the domestic airspace of the UK. Flights delayed or grounded in the UK caused a ripple effect across Europe, impacting airlines, airports, and travelers from various countries. The financial toll on airlines, the inconvenience suffered by passengers, and the negative impact on the economy cannot be underestimated.
As the investigations progress, it is crucial that lessons are learned and actions are taken to prevent such failures from occurring again. This incident should serve as a wake-up call for the industry and prompt a comprehensive review of system protocols and procedures, as well as a heightened emphasis on thorough testing and redundancy measures.
Air travel is a cornerstone of our globalized world, with millions of passengers relying on the efficiency and safety of air traffic control systems every day. It is imperative that we continuously invest in and improve these systems to ensure the seamless operation of the aviation industry.
In the aftermath of this unfortunate incident, it is essential that all stakeholders, including air traffic control authorities, airlines, and software developers, work collaboratively to address the root causes of the failure and implement robust safeguards to guarantee the stability and reliability of air traffic control in the United Kingdom and beyond.
Safety First! It sounds cliché but it's a fact— Better Late than Never.
Air traffic control is the remit of the DfT.. Sadly, Mark Harper is more useless and ignorant than previous Transport Secretary's Can't Shapps and Michael Green combined.
In other words, cheap code monkeys, instead of top notch professional software engineers, were employed to write the system, and it crashed catastrophically.
There always seems at NATS that they really don't do enough positive and more impotently negative testing on their systems.
Russia is behind this !
When a system receives data from elsewhere, it is supposed to check its format and its content, so the data can be used safely within the system. First, It seems that this checking process has been poorly implemented. Second that the whole system design is not that resilient.
A few hrs ago we were blaming the French lol
WTF does this mean ? – this is an example of non-sense-news !!!
This is like the doctor saying 'I'm going to put the patient to sleep because he is saying somethings….' what ???
Back in 2018 there were disruptions in Gatwick airport due to drones.
No culprit was found.
russia
Rubbish Cyber Attack for real
Flight data: someone called bobby drop tables tried to get a flight
What exactly does it mean when they say data was the issue .
APOLOGIES is all what British can say to hide their incompetence.
Am I the only person thinking this was some kind of cyber attack and we are being told a cover-up story…
English (British) to English (American) translation: Knock-on = Domino effect.
send better flight data. glad i could help.