Robert F. Kennedy Points Out High Spending On Ukraine, Bank Bailouts While Programs Cut For Citizens

Last month at a town hall in Rye, New Hampshire, 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy slammed the disparities between federal spending on U.S. citizens as compared to aid sent to Ukraine, on bank bailouts, and on the military industrial complex.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

#newjersey #news #newsusa…(read more)

LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Robert F. Kennedy, the former U.S. Attorney General and brother of President John F. Kennedy, has recently raised concerns about the disproportionate spending priorities of the U.S. government. In a speech delivered at the University of Virginia, Kennedy pointed out that the country’s financial resources are being allocated to Ukraine and bank bailouts, while crucial programs for American citizens are being cut.

Kennedy highlighted the staggering amount of money that the U.S. has spent on Ukraine, particularly in the form of military aid and support. He emphasized that these significant expenditures have not resulted in any substantial benefits for the American people. In fact, the allocation of a large portion of the budget to foreign aid has led to cutbacks in critical domestic programs that directly impact citizens’ lives.

Furthermore, Kennedy drew attention to the extensive bailouts provided to banks and financial institutions during the economic crisis in 2008. While these bailouts may have averted a complete collapse of the financial system, they also burdened taxpayers and diverted funds that could have been utilized to support essential social welfare programs.

Kennedy’s remarks underscore a growing sentiment among many Americans who believe that the government’s spending priorities are skewed and fail to adequately address the needs of the country’s own citizens. The widening wealth gap, inadequate healthcare access, and subpar educational infrastructure are just a few examples of areas where resources could be better allocated to improve the lives of the American people.

The concerns raised by Kennedy reflect a broader debate about the role of the U.S. government in shaping domestic and international policies. Many feel that there should be a greater emphasis on addressing the pressing issues facing American society, rather than prioritizing foreign interventions and corporate bailouts.

In conclusion, Robert F. Kennedy’s assertion that high spending on Ukraine and bank bailouts has come at the expense of essential programs for American citizens highlights a critical issue within the government’s budgetary decisions. As the country continues to navigate complex economic and geopolitical challenges, it is crucial to reevaluate and realign spending priorities to better serve the needs and interests of the American people.