H. A. Goodman Lifting 110 lbs. Dumbbells

If you want to support H. A. Goodman on Pateron:

Go to www.hagoodman.com to subscribe for the newsletter!

Republicans Should THANK GOD for Trump

Subscribe to H. A Goodman

Subscribe to H. A. Goodman’s Other Channel

Subscribe to The Stock Market Crash Channel

Stock Market Crash Ready to Bankrupt Banks, Hedge Funds as Margin Trading at All Time High
(H. A. Goodman predicted the market crash on Sept. 9, 2021 within Prediction Playlist)

If you want to support H. A. Goodman on Pateron:

I predicted the Stock Market Crash in The Federalist on Oct. 8, 2021:
Why Are Democrats Hurtling The United States Towards A Stock Market Crash?

To read my writing in The Federalist, The Hill, The Huffington Post, Salon, The Jerusalem Post and other publications, and watch my debates go to: www.hagoodman.com

Stock Market Crash Imminent as Inflation, CPI and PPI Rise, Margin Debt Hits Record, Confidence Low (H. A. Goodman started the Stock Market Crash Channel on Sept 16, 2021, this is my first segment)

Bitcoin CRASH Certain as U S Stock Market CRASH Caused by Evergrande Default Unfolding (H. A. Goodman predicted the Bitcoin and Crypto crash on Sept. 20, 2021)

Joe Biden’s Bitcoin CRASH to $10,000 and Dow Jones Fall to 20,000 Leading to Recession in 2022 (H. A. Goodman first predicted Bitcoin would crash below 10K on January 22, 2022)
…(read more)

HOW TO: Hedge Against Inflation

REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation

HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing

HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing

Supreme Court OVERTURNS TRUMP CONVICTION After Special Counsel Asks Judge for More Time

In a stunning turn of events, the Supreme Court has overturned former President Donald Trump’s conviction after the Special Counsel requested more time to build their case against him. This decision has ignited a firestorm of debate and speculation about the state of American politics and the impartiality of the judicial system.

The case against Trump was initially brought forward by the Special Counsel, who was tasked with investigating alleged wrongdoing during his tenure as the President. The charges included obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and incitement of insurrection due to the events that unfolded at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

However, the Special Counsel recently requested additional time to gather more evidence and build a stronger case. Citing the complexity and expansiveness of the investigation, they claimed that they needed more resources and a larger timeframe to ensure a fair trial. This request was met with mixed reactions, with some arguing that it was a delay tactic to weaken the case against Trump, while others believed it was necessary to ensure a thorough examination of the evidence.

Upon receiving the Special Counsel’s request, the judge overseeing the case granted the extension, allowing the investigation to continue for an unspecified amount of time. This decision was met with outrage from Trump’s supporters, who believed it to be a politically motivated attempt to undermine the former President’s reputation.

In an unexpected twist, the Supreme Court announced its decision to overturn Trump’s conviction. The ruling was based on a constitutional interpretation that stated the extension granted to the Special Counsel violated the defendant’s right to a speedy trial. The Court argued that the delay unfairly prejudiced Trump’s ability to defend himself, as it allowed for additional time for public opinion to sway against him.

The Supreme Court’s decision has ignited fierce debate across the nation. Supporters of Trump argue that this ruling vindicates their idol and proves that the investigation against him was a politically motivated witch hunt from the start. Critics, on the other hand, are concerned that this decision sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the authority of the Special Counsel’s investigation.

Many legal scholars and experts have expressed their reservation about this turn of events. They argue that the Supreme Court’s decision not only undermines the integrity of the trial but also the separation of powers within the American government. They fear it sets a dangerous precedent where any defendant, regardless of their guilt or innocence, can have their conviction overturned due to a technicality.

Nonetheless, the Supreme Court’s decision is final and cannot be appealed. This ruling brings an end to the legal proceedings against Trump, and his conviction will forever remain a contentious and divisive topic in American political history.

The aftermath of this decision is sure to have far-reaching consequences. It may further polarize an already deeply divided nation, with both sides using this ruling to bolster their arguments. It also sheds light on the delicate balance between the power of the judiciary and the authority of the Special Counsel, raising important questions about the accountability and independence of investigations into high-profile political figures.

As the dust settles on this extraordinary turn of events, it is more crucial than ever to reflect on the importance of a fair and transparent judicial system. The fact that a conviction against a former President can be overturned due to a procedural technicality highlights the need for comprehensive reforms to ensure justice is served and the public trusts in the integrity of the legal process.