Protect Your Retirement W/ A Gold. IRA
Metal:
Noble Gold is Who I Trust ^^^
Ranking every state by its specific ideology.
BECOME A MEMBER:
FOLLOW ME ON ALT TECH:
Bitchute:
Rumble:
Telegram:
Gab:
Parler:
DLive:
OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA:
Twitter:
Facebook:
Instagram:
TikTok:
Website:
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL:
Patreon:
SubscribeStar:
Cashapp: $redeaglepatriot
Thanks to Philip G., Stefan G., DustinTheNow, Ben Sinex, Caridad R., Ayrton S., Cedric A., Marshal Forward, Gerard O., Evan B., Mickey T., Carter D., Thulasidas, Mark B., Gerald A., Guy B., M4 for their $10/month or above support. To see your name here, donate to the $10/month or above Patreon or SubscribeStar tier.
#TierList…(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Precious Metals IRAs
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
TIER LIST: What Specific Ideology Does Each State Have?
In the diverse landscape of the United States, each state exhibits its own unique characteristics, not only in terms of geography and culture, but also in their specific political ideologies. Just as the United States is often described as a melting pot of cultures, it can also be seen as a mosaic of ideas, with varying beliefs and ideologies across the states. This article aims to explore a tier list of the specific ideologies commonly associated with each state, giving us a glimpse into the diverse political landscape that exists across the nation.
Tier 1: Liberal/Progressive States
States like California, New York, Massachusetts, and Oregon are often hailed as bastions of liberal and progressive ideology. These states tend to prioritize social issues such as gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental protection, and equitable healthcare. They often embrace progressive policies regarding climate change, immigration, and social justice reform. These states lean heavily Democratic and have been at the forefront of pushing forward progressive agendas.
Tier 2: Conservative States
On the other end of the spectrum, we have states like Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Idaho that are commonly associated with conservative ideologies. These states typically lean Republican and prioritize issues such as limited government intervention, lower taxes, and the preservation of traditional values. Conservative states often prioritize religion, gun rights, and take a more traditional stance on social issues, like abortion and marriage equality.
Tier 3: Moderate States
The vast majority of states can be classified as moderate, meaning they don’t lean extremely towards either liberal or conservative ideologies. These states, including Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, and Colorado, tend to have a more balanced political landscape with voters who embrace both left-leaning and right-leaning policies. Moderate states often swing between Republican and Democratic candidates in elections as their ideologies are more nuanced and dependent on specific candidates and issues.
Tier 4: Libertarian States
Libertarianism, which encompasses ideas like limited government intervention and individual freedoms, has its strongest foothold in states like Alaska, New Hampshire, and Wyoming. These states prioritize minimal regulations, low taxes, and individual liberties. They often advocate for less government influence in both personal and economic aspects of life. While they may be aligned with conservative principles on some issues, the libertarian ideology distinguishes itself by emphasizing personal freedom over social conservatism.
Tier 5: States with Regional Influences
Several states have ideologies that are shaped by regional considerations or specific circumstances. For example, states like Hawaii and Alaska display unique ideologies due to their geographical isolation. States with significant Native American populations, like Oklahoma and New Mexico, often prioritize the importance of tribal sovereignty and cultural preservation. Other states, such as Nevada and Colorado, have been influenced by the growing importance of the marijuana industry and may have more lenient stances on drug policy.
It is important to note that these classifications are based on general observations and should not be taken as an absolute representation of each state’s population. Political ideologies can vary within states, and perspectives can change over time due to shifting demographics and societal trends. Additionally, influential political figures can shape ideologies beyond what may be considered typical for a state.
Understanding the specific ideologies of each state is crucial in comprehending the broader political landscape of the United States. These differences in beliefs and priorities contribute to the vibrant democracy and dynamic discussions that shape policies at both state and national levels. So, the next time you engage in a political discussion, remember that each state has its unique ideology, contributing to the rich tapestry of American political thought.
Protect Your Retirement W/ A Gold. IRA
Metal: https://noblegoldinvestments.com/gold-silver-ira-lp-v2/?offer_type=gold&affiliate_source=affiliate_redeagle
Noble Gold is Who I Trust ^^^
If Texas gets too liberal I think Tennessee would be a good state to move to.
Maine as a culture I think belongs on the same tier as Alaska; Maine is VERY classical liberal. ¶ Massachusetts should go on the Social Democratic tier. There are some social conservatives there, but the overall state is soc. dem.
I am curious how my state (New York) will be impacted by Democrats colonizing Upstate. Haven’t personally met too many city goers that are flooding the cities and suburbs up here, though 2022 was a pretty massive red wave up here (thank New York Republicans exclusively for retaking the House). A lot of Democrats in NYC would have wanted to remain in-state and not go to a swing-state. However, a lot of big names are moving to Florida and especially Texas and taking their leftist employees with them. If NYC and Long Island both vanished, we would become Pennsylvania 2.0
Life-long Arizonan here… Arizona is libertarian through and through. We don’t like being told what to do no matter what side of the aisle it’s from:
With me I'm mostly Libertarian. I love to own guns with no restrictions and I do support a free open market.
I totally disagree that Lindsey Graham is a "generic conservative." He is neolib/neocon, much like Hillary and Biden, although he must be more discreet because he represents a state that is more conservative than he is. Also, I think there is something wrong with a classification system that puts such states as Tenn., Ala., and Ark. in a different category from states such as La., Tx., and NC. Some of your "generic conservative" states are just as national populist as others, but Trump sometimes underperforms among religious conservatives because he is (correctly) perceived as less morally conservative and less religious than they would prefer, not because they lack enthusiasm for right populism.
Trump has never tried very hard (compared for example with Ted Cruz) to appeal to conservative Christian churchgoers, even though most of them find his messages of reviving domestic manufactures, ending illegal immigration and restricting Muslim immigration, ending military adventurism without a clear national interest, and draining the swamp very appealing.
Also, the somewhat different electoral outcomes in some culturally similar states are often due to state differences in the quality of Republican leadership rather than actual grassroots differences in ideology. Certainly white Southerners (not counting recent immigrants from more liberal parts of the country) have very similar values and outlooks regardless of which state you visit. Church attendance rates can make a difference too. I read that in the 2016 primaries, counties in WV with more churchgoers went for Cruz, while those with fewer churchgoers (probably due to a failure of local religious leadership, not really significant differences in belief) voted for Trump. A candidate who is both national – populist and theologically conservative could close this gap.
Fetterman is an unabashed social democrat, not a generic populist. Could you be underestimating how left leaning PA has become?
14:09 uh
California belongs under social democratic
What does right-wing cultural mean?
16:00 …Even though the Republican Party is so weak there… LMAO. Aged quite well by November of 2021.
This is interesting..love any state that believe in God…
Anyone who loves their country…is good in my books….lot of retired people live in Florida and religious…have noticed..
Love anything Republican and conservative,…values..
Proud to be a populist
Glad to see my home state of Indiana going in a national populist direction.
My state Illinois has to go under Social Liberal especially since Governor Pritzker has radilize the state
These lists bring tiers to my eyes.
As a resident of South Carolina, I can say I'm embarrassed by our state GOP. All I see on local news is "Republicans compromise with democrats…". Nancy Mace is a hot mess. Tom Rice, at least, should lose his primary (Horry County, which accounts for more than 50% of the district, doesn't play well with back-stabbers).
Seeing Arizona and Virginia in the same category is not sitting right with me. I would move AZ to genetic conservative.
Oregon would be a conservative state if it weren't for Multnomah county.
By next election we in Florida will be generic conservative. Thank god.
Ok
Honestly moderate/centrist should have been a category on this list for states that don’t exactly fit into any of these categories like Arizona and Georgia.
Generic Conservative here seems to combine both RINOs and Neocons? Always wondered how you define the difference between the two? RINOs being more open to socially liberal ideas but Neocons less so though Neocons defined by being very hawkish on military intervention?
And Generic Neoliberal what is your definition there? I always heard of neoliberal being a description of economics being like Reaganomics? And how do you differentiate between Libertarian and Generic Populist as the two ideas seem to overlap and go hand in hand mostly?
Overall with each state I can see where you are coming from but I would swap California for Hawaii here. CA really seems to embrace radical left woke social democrats or Democratic Socialist types but Hawaii may have a consistent Dem voting record but they seem more establishment JFK types not woke AOC types there?
Ohio would belong more in Generic Populist rather than National Populist in that like Florida and Iowa and the Rust Belt and Lakes States it has been known to embrace populists of both sides as seen by the swings to the right in the Trump era but also attracting some Dem populists too.
The most difficult state to define here I think is North Carolina. I would put it in your Generic Neoliberal category perhaps if that is where the purple swing states like Arizona and Nevada are and the stats of NC seem to show its electorate being just like that?
I'd disagree with where California is placed. I could see it being there 20 years ago, but not now. Especially since they were the one who elected Bernie back in Super Tuesday, as well as being his biggest funder. He couldn't get enough of the SSR. Plus, the way its handling certain issues similarly enough to a Communist state in terms of Media outlets muting, turning peoples against peoples, and state rigged elects. Plus, how the gov has been "experimenting" with social democracy as of recently, as well as making treaties with other nations(States not allowed to do this). Not to mention the amount of Socialists in the Collages here, the amount of unfixed issues used for political purpose, etc.
Georgia is not "neoliberal". It is "neomassivefraud". Allowing Fulton and DeKalb counties to ballot harvest 100,000 votes is not an indication of a change in political sentiment.
By 2025, Indiana will be the most populated national populist/conservative state in the country.
I would make some swaps here.
North Carolina is definitely a generic populist State, as one of the few States to split the ballot in 2020 It earns that.
Minnesota belongs in the generic liberal category.
California belongs in the bernie bro category.
Nevada is more libertarian than neoliberal, I mean they are the only State with legal prostitution after all.
Georgia does not belong down in generic neoliberal, although I would struggle to classify it given these options.
Generic populist for Michigan? Need I remind you they voted for Biden. But going off that logic, Georgia should be general populist too. Georgia is deep red outside of Atlanta, Macon, and Savannah.
Not sure where your are from, but you should get out more. West Virginia being in your second tier, but has elected Democrats (including former KKK member Robert Bird) until Hilary said "kill coal miner jobs." Idaho has been the most red state since 1992 with a super majority of conservatives elected to their state senate and no Dem elected to senate or congress since 1996. Tenn brought us AlGore. Yes that was some time ago, about the time he invented the internet. Arkansas gave us Bill Clinton and Hilary. Need I say more. So you have some history to catch up with and some more work to do.
How is california not in Social Democratic group?
I would probably say Wyoming is libertarian
California should be social democratic.
Great list! I feel like California could go under social democratic as it’s very similar politically to Oregon and Washington, but it easily can go under generic liberal as well. Same thing with Massachusetts, they are very socially liberal more than they are economically. I could see Delaware as going under generic neoliberal because it’s generally an affordable state to live in and it’s very tax friendly but it’s still very much a liberal state. I feel like Ohio is roughly the same politically as Iowa right now so I could see it going under generic populist, but it definitely could go under National populist as well.
You should do European countries next.
Hoosiers don't vote liberals and communists.
You're 100% right on that.
GA is definitely generic populist overall but the GOP leaders are neoconservative and that’s what ruins the state. FL is in between libertarian and generic populist though it used to be in between libertarian and neoconservative in the 1990s and the Bush era