Dave Ramsey’s co-host, George Kamel, suffered backlash recently for going against the standard “4% rule” that Dave and many others teach about retirement and how much you can take out a year to live. George said what I commonly teach which is more like a 3% rule if you want to make retirement last.
Listen and hear my thoughts on Dave’s response to the challenge and learn how you can properly prepare for retirement – no 4% rule required!
What’s your Passive Income Potential? –
#daveramsey #georgekamel #financialliteracy…(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Qualified Retirement Plans
REVEALED: How To Invest During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
Here’s Why Dave Ramsey’s Co-Host Disagrees On The 4% Rule
While Dave Ramsey has become a household name in the world of personal finance, his co-host, Chris Hogan, recently expressed his disagreement with one of the key principles of retirement planning that Ramsey often espouses – the 4% rule.
The 4% rule, popularized by financial planner Bill Bengen in the 1990s, suggests that retirees can withdraw 4% of their retirement portfolio each year without running out of money over a 30-year period. This rule has been widely adopted by financial advisors and retirement planners as a guide for sustainable withdrawals during retirement.
However, Hogan has raised concerns about the 4% rule, citing the changing landscape of retirement planning and investment markets. He argues that with the current low-interest rate environment and increased life expectancy, the 4% rule may not be as reliable as it once was.
Hogan emphasizes the need for a more dynamic approach to retirement withdrawals, taking into account individual circumstances and market conditions. He advocates for a strategy that adjusts withdrawal rates based on portfolio performance, rather than relying on a static 4% withdrawal rate.
In essence, Hogan believes that the 4% rule may not be suitable for everyone, and that retirees should be flexible and adaptable in their approach to retirement income planning. He urges individuals to work with a financial advisor who can provide personalized guidance and create a retirement income plan tailored to their specific needs and goals.
While Ramsey and Hogan may differ in their perspectives on the 4% rule, their overarching message remains the same – the importance of sound financial planning and responsible management of one’s resources. Ultimately, the goal is to achieve financial security and peace of mind in retirement, and both Ramsey and Hogan strive to help individuals achieve that objective through their advice and guidance.
As the landscape of retirement planning continues to evolve, it is essential for individuals to stay informed and seek out knowledgeable professionals who can help them navigate the complexities of retirement income planning. By remaining open to different viewpoints and considering alternative strategies, retirees can make informed decisions that align with their unique financial circumstances and objectives.
The 4% or even 8% "rule" is false anyway, in that everyone's living expenses are different.
If you are disabled with poor health, $80,000 may not be enough.
If you live in California or New York, it may not be enough
If you are single and raising your grand children because your own child passed away, it most certainly isn't enough
But if you are frugal and living in the middle of Montana, $40,000 is plenty
you do realize that the S&P 500 has averaged a 7.7% return after inflation right? i think you should re Analize your video buddy.
All this made me think was that paid for real estate is less risky than I thought.
The trick would be at any withdrawl rate, to have the expected remaining balance calculated over time and be ready to reduce your withdrawl rate and cut your spending if the balance drops below that level because of market fluctuations. Always be aware of how the market changes get you.
I’m shocked at the nonsense Dave is spewing and his arrogance. When has the stock market continuously averaged 12%.
Dave invest in mutual funds idiot. It’s not the s&p. What have you done to help people get out of debt
401Ks are a robbery. it’s only when your company matches it but it’s better to have it outside of the 401K
can some one provide a link to Kamel's video that instigated the outburst?
Oh my gosh this is hilarious! Even Rachel is questioning his nonsense ! And apparently this Christian man doesn't know the Proverb that says that Pride goeth before the fall!