The story of the bank bailouts, and what we’ve gotten so far in return.
by Omid Malekan
www.omidmalekan.com
@malekanoms…(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Bank Failures
REVEALED: Best Investment During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
Bank Bailouts Explained: What You Need to Know
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the term “bank bailout” became a hot topic in the world of finance and economics. But what exactly does it mean, and why are bank bailouts necessary? In this article, we will explore the concept of bank bailouts and explain why they are often seen as a necessary evil in times of financial turmoil.
What is a Bank Bailout?
A bank bailout refers to the financial assistance provided to a struggling bank or financial institution by the government or a central bank. This assistance can come in various forms, including direct cash injections, government guarantees, or the purchase of troubled assets.
Why are Bank Bailouts Necessary?
Bank bailouts are typically undertaken in response to a financial crisis or a severe economic downturn. When banks are facing the risk of insolvency, there is a real danger of a domino effect within the financial system. A collapse of one large financial institution can lead to a ripple effect, causing panic among depositors, a freeze in lending, and ultimately a full-blown financial meltdown.
In such situations, the government or central bank steps in to prevent further damage to the economy and the financial system. By providing financial assistance to troubled banks, authorities aim to stabilize the banking sector, restore confidence, and prevent a systemic collapse.
The Controversy Surrounding Bank Bailouts
Bank bailouts are not without controversy. Critics argue that they can create a “moral hazard,” as they may encourage reckless behavior among banks by making them feel immune to the consequences of their risky actions. In other words, knowing that they will be bailed out in case of failure, banks may take on excessive risks and engage in speculative activities, which could ultimately lead to another financial crisis.
Moreover, bank bailouts often raise questions of fairness and equity. Many taxpayers are understandably frustrated when they see their hard-earned money being used to rescue financial institutions that have made irresponsible decisions. This has led to public outcry and calls for more stringent regulations to prevent the need for future bailouts.
Lessons Learned and Reforms Made
The 2008 financial crisis served as a wake-up call for governments and regulators around the world. In its aftermath, significant efforts were made to reform the financial industry and prevent similar crises in the future. This included the implementation of stricter capital requirements, stress tests for banks, and the creation of resolution frameworks for handling failed banks.
Additionally, governments have put in place measures to minimize the cost of bailouts for taxpayers. For example, some countries have established resolution funds financed by the banking industry, aiming to cover the expenses of future bank rescues.
In Conclusion
Bank bailouts are a highly controversial and complex topic. While they are often seen as a necessary evil to prevent a financial meltdown, they come with significant downsides and pose risks to the stability of the financial system. It is crucial for governments and regulators to strike a balance between providing support to troubled banks and holding them accountable for their actions, in order to prevent future crises and protect taxpayers’ interests.
relevant today
Came back to this vid because I just saw a YouTube ad about financial advisors from The JP Morgan Chase Bear Stearns Washington Mutual. lmao
… Classic.
I wish this guy would create some new videos
This would be funny if it wasn't so damn true.
As a 20 year old who saw this happen in real time but had no understanding of it this is very eye opening
I've never run the numbers on this but at one time I believe it was said it would have been cheaper for the Govt. to just pay off EVERY home loan in the U.S. than giving money to the banks. Has anyone ever done the math?
I hate that these are more relevant in 2021 than they were back in 2011, but at the same time I love it.
2 bigger to fail
Classic
Screw your own customers?
My god
How it that possible?
Still hilarious in 2021.
6:36 Another reason why we shouldn’t pay income taxes
uh oh… why am i getting recommended these now D:
The Timothy Jeeethner and The Ben Bernank
I wish this guy still made material
Boy this is fun to watch in 2020. At least change at the end of a noose seems to be imminent the minute eviction protections of the millions of now-jobless Americans ends in a month.
9 years old and still relevant. this will be relevant 100 years 1000 years 999999 years from now
“ The video goes on to highlight some other absurdities from the financial crisis, like ex-Merrill CEO John Thain, now CEO of CIT Group (NYSE: CIT), using company money to buy a $70,000 desk while his bank was receiving taxpayer support. To be fair, the video is wrong. The desk was only $18,000; the credenza cost 70,000.”
As I searched this, I noticed other examples of gov officials using taxpayer money to purchase furniture costing more than most Americans make in a year. Like FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, fired for lying under oath ($70K on a conference table, and an EPA official. It’s time to start voting for people outside the establishment parties who will put a stop to this.
Bastards! Aspiration.com is right
They should of let them failed
Goldman Sachs, literally a weapon on financial destruction.
This is hilariously infuriating.
"We want to rob the country."
"Get a banking license."
So, it's the jews
buy bitcoin
I still laugh out loud when I hear "the ben bernank". Hahaha!
When you already own the US Government, you don't need to buy any bank. LOL