Are you nearing retirement age and considering when to start taking Social Security? It’s a big decision with many factors to consider, and it can have a major impact on your financial well-being in retirement. In this video, Medicare Retirement Expert, Marvin, breaks down the pros and cons of taking Social Security before age 65, one of the earliest possible ages to start collecting benefits, and how it relates to Medicare.
On the one hand, taking Social Security at age 62 to 65 can provide an immediate source of income. It can be particularly appealing if you’re facing financial challenges or health issues that make working difficult. However, there are some significant downsides to taking Social Security early. For one thing, you’ll receive a smaller monthly benefit than waiting until your full retirement age (typically between 66 and 67, depending on your birth year). Additionally, taking Social Security early can reduce the total benefits you receive over your lifetime, as your benefits will be reduced by a certain percentage for each year you take them early.
But how does taking Social Security before age 65 relate to Medicare? Marvin explains that if you start taking Social Security at 62 through 65, and how you’ll automatically enroll in Medicare Part A and Part B at age 65. However, if you delay taking Social Security, you may need to actively enroll in Medicare when you turn 65 to avoid potential penalties.
In this video, Marvin Musick fo Medicare School covers:
How Social Security benefits are calculated and how taking them early can impact your monthly benefit and overall lifetime benefits
The pros and cons of taking Social Security at age 65, including how it can impact your retirement income and tax situation
How taking Social Security before age 65 relates to Medicare, including the potential penalties for delaying enrollment
Strategies for maximizing your Social Security benefits, including delaying your benefits until your full retirement age or even later, if possible
Tips for planning for retirement and building a solid financial foundation for your golden years, regardless of when you decide to start taking Social Security
If you’re approaching retirement age or want to learn more about Social Security and Medicare, this video is for you. Don’t make a hasty decision that could majorly impact your future financial security – watch this video and learn from the experts!
✅ Watch the internet’s #1 Online Medicare Educational Workshop for FREE:
✅ To get 1 on 1 Help from our Team, Schedule a Call Here:
✅ Join our weekly live Q&A through our Facebook group (click the link and press “Join”:
#medicare #retirement #medicareschool #medigap #supplementplan #medicaresupplement #retirementrealtalk #retiring…(read more)
LEARN MORE ABOUT: Qualified Retirement Plans
REVEALED: How To Invest During Inflation
HOW TO INVEST IN GOLD: Gold IRA Investing
HOW TO INVEST IN SILVER: Silver IRA Investing
Taking Social Security at 65: A HUGE Mistake? Retirement Expert Explains!
As we approach retirement age, one burning question on most individuals’ minds is when to start claiming Social Security benefits. Many believe that beginning to receive Social Security at age 65 is the ideal move, as it was traditionally considered the age of retirement. However, retirement experts argue that this decision can actually be a colossal mistake. In this article, we will delve into the reasons behind this assertion and unveil the optimal approach to claiming Social Security benefits.
To clarify, there is nothing inherently wrong with taking Social Security benefits at 65. It is, after all, the age at which most individuals become eligible for full retirement benefits. However, the mistake lies in the potential missed opportunities and financial consequences that come with this decision.
Firstly, it is crucial to understand that the full retirement age for Social Security benefits is not universally set at 65 anymore. Depending on your birth year, it could be 66, 67, or somewhere in between. Claiming benefits before reaching your full retirement age will result in a reduction in the monthly payment you receive for the rest of your life. Hence, if you decide to start receiving benefits at 65, you will likely receive a reduced amount compared to what you would receive if you waited until your full retirement age.
Moreover, starting Social Security at 65 might not align with your personal financial situation. Many individuals, as they age, opt to continue working either part-time or full-time. If you claim benefits while still working, your Social Security payments might be subject to income limits, resulting in a reduced benefit. This could be a significant financial setback, especially if you rely heavily on Social Security to cover your living expenses.
Another aspect to consider is the potential for longevity. People are living longer today, thanks to advances in healthcare and lifestyle changes. As a result, delaying Social Security benefits allows for an increase in the monthly payment you will receive. By waiting, you effectively trade a few years of smaller payments for a higher monthly payout once you start claiming benefits.
Additionally, an overlooked factor when deciding when to take Social Security is the impact on spousal benefits. Spouses are often eligible to receive benefits based on their spouse’s earning record. If the primary earner waits until their full retirement age or even longer to claim Social Security, their spouse might be entitled to a higher monthly payment. This can be particularly advantageous if the spouse did not work enough to qualify for substantial benefits on their own.
Now that we have explored the potential downsides of taking Social Security at 65, let’s discuss the optimal approach. Retirement experts suggest considering waiting until at least your full retirement age, if not longer, to claim benefits. By doing so, you can unlock higher monthly payments and potentially maximize your overall benefits. This strategy becomes even more beneficial if you are healthy and have other sources of income to sustain you in the meantime.
Ultimately, the decision of when to start claiming Social Security is deeply personal and depends on various factors, including your financial situation, health, and retirement goals. Consulting with a retirement expert or financial advisor can provide valuable insights tailored to your specific circumstances.
In conclusion, while taking Social Security at 65 might still be a popular belief, it can be a significant mistake. By thoroughly analyzing your options and considering the potential long-term consequences, you can make an informed decision that maximizes your benefits and secures a comfortable retirement. Remember, retirement is a journey, so plan wisely and consult professionals to guide you along the way.
✅ Watch the internet's #1 Online Medicare Educational Workshop for FREE:
https://www.medicareschool.com/get-the-workshop-now?source=yt
✅ To get 1 on 1 Help from our Team, Schedule a Call Here:
https://www.medicareschool.com/talk-to-a-guide?source=yt
If you have no retirement savings, you better wait till full retirement age. If not, I say enjoy your life and retire at 62. I wouldn’t retire unless my home and car was paid off.
Still have my pension!
I’m 62 and I make to much income anyway to take my SS.
So I’m SOLuck
You break even saps crack me up, just an excuse for quitting early! Yeah if your job sucks I get it. But be prepared to be eating bolonga sandwichs! Me I like steak! Its a personal descision but shit aint gonna get cheaper. Good Luck
What a waste if time. You think people are this stupid? Have to listen for 10-15 minutes if waisted time, Geeze. It also says right when you download at any time, 35 years…Geeze
I was born in '46, and they told me full retirement age was 65. Social Security and their printed material were wrong?
ITS NO MISTAKE PEOPLE!
Retire early. YOU DONT WHEN YOUR LAST DAY WILL BE. Enjoy your life NOW. Instead of being GREEDY with money. A stupid thing to be at that age.
If you cant apply for Medicare until you are 65,and healthcare is too expensive what do you do when you retire at 62 for coverage?
I’m trying to figure out if SS benefit is reduce at age 70 if I start collecting at age 67 and continue to work until 70. Right now if I work until age 70 my FRA benefit at 67 is $2900/mo and at 70 $3600/mo. But, if I start collecting SS at 67 and continue to work, will my $3600/mo benefit at 70 decrease bc I’ve been collecting since age 67?
As a single woman, never married, no kids, but took care of my parents and they had nothing to leave me….I will be working until at least 67. If I retired earlier, I would only be able to pay mortgage and HOA, and utilities, but no eating or medical monies available.
60,000 a year for 35 year is 2.1 million not 2.7 milllion, no?
Take it at 62, take it as soon as you can……….
Take the money as soon as you can, at the rate things are going there will be nothing left in SS. The earlier you take it the more you get in the long term. Think about how many people die before they reach 70.
Finally a video that mentions that the money withheld, not penalized, is returned to you after you reach FRA !!
Every decision is personal. For me, having a child under 18, when I took SS at 62.5, she got $1000/mo until she turned 18 or finished high school, which ever came last. since she was only 14 that meant 4 x 12 x $1000 =, $48,000. That greatly added to my total SS benefit. Great decision for me
never gamble with your life being longer.
Always get the cash NOW… never wait.
There are people saying you should take ssi at 62, and still work the $21,000. But then you are giving up 30% of your ssi at 67…so with inflation idk can you afford to give up 30% in ssi??
This guy looks 70 but in great shape nice 🙂
The only important question to ask is – "when do I plan to die"? From there, everything is just math.
Can you better explain the earnings test for the year you turn FRA? Should we start taking Ss on January 1 of the year we are turning FRA or do we still wait for the 66 yrs 6 months date to claim? Which are you recommending?
All the experts have different opinions but the only thing I could tell you is if you work all your life like I have retiring at 65 was the best option it's not about the money it's about getting some peace of mind for the hard work you put in because we are not promised tomorrow
I will take it as soon as I can because I don't know if I'm still here tomorrow.
I’ll be 66.5 January 28 2024, I plan to take it then, which is my full retirement age.
What happens if you take social security 65 when your full retirement age is 67?
You can calculate all you want. I have been to 3 wakes in the last month of people in their early 60’s. Take it and run. My Dad died at 61 after working like a dog his whole life. Not one SS payment. I took a city job at age 20, did 21 years. Been collecting a nice pension for 18 years. Even people retiring now who will receive more, will have a hard time collecting more than me. Got another high paying job for 11 years and I am retired now. I am 59 years old now. Home run. I beat them already.
I started stacking to SAVE wealth. I've always been the type of person to spend my entire paycheck. I hate having money just sit in the bank. I am under pressure to grow my reserve of $950k. before I turn 65, I would appreciate any advice on potential investments.
I’m taking it at 62, as a cancer survivor to count on tomorrow is thinking foolish!
I don't understand this break even exactly what does that mean?
Hi Marvin, since I continue to earn an income after my FRA I will continue to pay into the social security tax on that income. I understand generally once you collect SS your benefit except for COLA does not change. However, I believe I read when you continue to contribute to SS taxes you are eligible for an increased benefit based on the additional taxes paid post FRA. Do you have any insight into this? Thnx, J